Expert eyes, improving articles, one edit at a time.
WikiHow_talk:Article Review Team is a page on WikiHow dedicated to discussions and coordination among members of the Article Review Team. This team is responsible for reviewing and improving the quality of articles on WikiHow, ensuring they meet specific guidelines and standards. The talk page serves as a platform for team members to discuss policies, procedures, and any issues related to article review.
Navigating the Article Review Process
The Article Review process at wikiHow is a crucial step in ensuring that our content meets the highest standards of accuracy, comprehensiveness, and helpfulness. As a new writer, understanding this process is essential for successfully publishing your articles. Upon submitting a draft, your article will be placed in the review queue. This queue is not a first-come, first-served system; instead, articles are prioritized based on factors like topic relevance and queue size. Therefore, it’s important to be patient as you await feedback.
Once an Article Reviewer reaches your article, they will carefully assess it against our established criteria. This assessment involves evaluating various aspects, including the article’s title, introduction, steps, and overall clarity. The reviewer will provide detailed feedback, highlighting areas for improvement and suggesting specific changes. It’s important to remember that this feedback is intended to be constructive and help you enhance your article.
Upon receiving the reviewer’s feedback, take the time to carefully understand their comments and suggestions. If any points are unclear, don’t hesitate to ask for clarification. The Article Reviewer is there to guide you through the process and ensure your article reaches its full potential. Next, diligently address the feedback provided. This may involve rewriting sections, adding more information, or clarifying certain points.
After revising your article, submit the updated version, and it will be placed back in the review queue. The reviewer will then assess your revisions and determine if the article is ready for publication. In some cases, further revisions might be necessary, leading to an iterative process of feedback and improvement. Throughout this process, maintaining open communication with the Article Reviewer is key.
Remember that the Article Review process is collaborative. Both the writer and the reviewer share the common goal of creating high-quality, helpful content for our readers. By embracing feedback, being open to suggestions, and actively engaging in the process, you can significantly increase the chances of your article being published on wikiHow.
Understanding WikiHow’s Content Standards
WikiHow is committed to providing our readers with high-quality, reliable information. To achieve this, we’ve established a robust set of content standards that guide our article creation and review processes. These standards ensure that every article published on wikiHow meets our criteria for accuracy, objectivity, helpfulness, and trustworthiness.
One of the cornerstones of our content standards is a commitment to accuracy. We believe that our readers deserve information that is factually correct and up-to-date. To uphold this principle, we require all articles to be thoroughly researched and supported by credible sources. These sources may include academic journals, government websites, reputable news outlets, and recognized experts in their respective fields. By grounding our articles in verifiable information, we aim to provide our readers with content they can rely on.
Furthermore, we place a strong emphasis on objectivity in our articles. WikiHow strives to present information in a neutral and unbiased manner, avoiding personal opinions or beliefs. Our goal is to empower readers to make informed decisions based on factual evidence, rather than subjective viewpoints. To maintain objectivity, we encourage the use of neutral language and the presentation of multiple perspectives when discussing potentially controversial topics.
Of course, the ultimate goal of any wikiHow article is to be helpful to the reader. We strive to provide practical, actionable advice that can be easily understood and implemented. Our articles should address specific problems or questions that readers may have, offering clear and concise solutions or guidance. To ensure helpfulness, we encourage writers to focus on providing practical tips, step-by-step instructions, and real-world examples that readers can readily apply to their own lives.
Finally, trustworthiness is paramount to our content standards. We understand that readers need to have confidence in the information they find on wikiHow. Therefore, we prioritize transparency and accountability in our editorial process. All articles undergo a rigorous review process, which may involve fact-checking, editing for clarity and style, and ensuring adherence to our content policies. This meticulous approach helps us maintain the high level of trustworthiness that our readers have come to expect from wikiHow.
In conclusion, wikiHow’s content standards are designed to ensure that our articles are accurate, objective, helpful, and trustworthy. By adhering to these principles, we strive to provide our readers with high-quality information that they can rely on to learn new things, solve problems, and improve their lives.
Contributing to a Positive Team Environment
The Article Review Team at wikiHow thrives on collaboration and mutual respect. As a team member, your contributions play a vital role in fostering a positive and productive environment. To that end, it’s essential to approach interactions with a spirit of collegiality and a willingness to learn from one another. Constructive feedback is the cornerstone of our work, so when providing feedback on articles, focus on the content itself rather than the author. Phrasing your suggestions objectively and offering specific examples will ensure clarity and prevent misunderstandings. For instance, instead of saying “This section is confusing,” you might say, “The explanation in the second paragraph could be clearer. Perhaps consider providing a step-by-step example.”
Furthermore, remember that every team member brings valuable perspectives and experiences to the table. Embracing diverse viewpoints enriches our discussions and leads to more comprehensive article reviews. When engaging in discussions, actively listen to your colleagues’ perspectives, even if they differ from your own. Should disagreements arise, address them respectfully and professionally, focusing on finding common ground and reaching a consensus that benefits the article and wikiHow’s mission.
Moreover, maintaining a positive team environment extends beyond individual interactions. Actively participating in team discussions and offering your insights contributes to a vibrant and engaging atmosphere. Sharing your knowledge and expertise benefits the entire team and strengthens our collective understanding of wikiHow’s guidelines. Equally important is acknowledging the contributions of others. A simple “thank you” or a word of appreciation can go a long way in fostering a culture of recognition and mutual respect.
Ultimately, contributing to a positive team environment is an ongoing process that requires conscious effort and a shared commitment to collaboration, respect, and open communication. By embracing these principles, we can ensure that the Article Review Team remains a productive and rewarding space for all members.
Q&A
1. **What does the wikiHow Article Review Team do?** They review articles for trustworthiness, accuracy, helpfulness, and adherence to wikiHow’s style guidelines.
2. **Who are the members of the wikiHow Article Review Team?** They are experienced wikiHow contributors who have demonstrated strong writing and editing skills.
3. **Why is the wikiHow Article Review Team important?** They ensure that wikiHow articles provide reliable and high-quality information to readers.The wikiHow Article Review Team plays a vital role in maintaining the quality and trustworthiness of wikiHow’s content through collaborative review, ensuring articles meet editorial standards and are helpful, reliable, and objective.
